<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Aaron Marks IT Consulting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.aaronmarks.com</link>
	<description>EHLO; MAIL FROM: Aaron; RCPT TO: You; SUBJECT: Enjoy!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 03:47:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lync PIC Federation problems with MSN Messenger: external.ap.messenger.online.lync.com by Aaron Marks</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=128#comment-137481</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Marks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 03:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=128#comment-137481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FWIW, outlook.com federation is now supported by Microsoft.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW, outlook.com federation is now supported by Microsoft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lync PIC Federation problems with MSN Messenger: external.ap.messenger.online.lync.com by Aaron Marks</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=128#comment-137480</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Marks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 03:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=128#comment-137480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@jguel, you add a new entry.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jguel, you add a new entry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lync PIC Federation problems with MSN Messenger: external.ap.messenger.online.lync.com by jguel</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=128#comment-137019</link>
		<dc:creator>jguel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 21:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=128#comment-137019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Need more info on how to set this up please.

Do you add a new entry or replace the existing one in the federated domain list? If new entry what is the associated domain?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Need more info on how to set this up please.</p>
<p>Do you add a new entry or replace the existing one in the federated domain list? If new entry what is the associated domain?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lync PIC Federation problems with MSN Messenger: external.ap.messenger.online.lync.com by vfrjas</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=128#comment-132750</link>
		<dc:creator>vfrjas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 12:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=128#comment-132750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agreed, good job. Could you post the steps needed to create a new Public IM provider to allow communication with the Access Edge of external.ap.messenger.online.lync.com?
Regards
JS]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, good job. Could you post the steps needed to create a new Public IM provider to allow communication with the Access Edge of external.ap.messenger.online.lync.com?<br />
Regards<br />
JS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lync PIC Federation problems with MSN Messenger: external.ap.messenger.online.lync.com by it consulting</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=128#comment-120710</link>
		<dc:creator>it consulting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 08:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=128#comment-120710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice post! I completely agree with your all the statements. Figuring this out must have taken out about a day of troubleshooting because of everything to double-check.
Thanks for the post!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post! I completely agree with your all the statements. Figuring this out must have taken out about a day of troubleshooting because of everything to double-check.<br />
Thanks for the post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lync PIC Federation problems with MSN Messenger: external.ap.messenger.online.lync.com by Carl</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=128#comment-117338</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 10:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=128#comment-117338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I also had this problem.   I can message with Federated contacts and AOL contacts fine, but MSN and Hotmail contacts I now get Presence Unknown.  I tried your suggestion above but it still isn&#039;t working.  When you added a new Public Provider, is there a special Provider Name I have to use?  How does Lync know to use the new address for Hotmail and MSN messages?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also had this problem.   I can message with Federated contacts and AOL contacts fine, but MSN and Hotmail contacts I now get Presence Unknown.  I tried your suggestion above but it still isn&#8217;t working.  When you added a new Public Provider, is there a special Provider Name I have to use?  How does Lync know to use the new address for Hotmail and MSN messages?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lync PIC Federation problems with MSN Messenger: external.ap.messenger.online.lync.com by LyncAdmin</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=128#comment-115705</link>
		<dc:creator>LyncAdmin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=128#comment-115705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can you put up a screen shot of what you did?  
Did you create a new &quot;MSN&quot; entry and remove the old?  Or add an new &quot;MNS-NEW&quot; entry with the new entry listed?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you put up a screen shot of what you did?<br />
Did you create a new &#8220;MSN&#8221; entry and remove the old?  Or add an new &#8220;MNS-NEW&#8221; entry with the new entry listed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Exchange 2007 to 2010 Outlook Anywhere Transition by Josh Lynch</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=108#comment-88418</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Lynch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 09:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=108#comment-88418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aaron, thanks for this post. Very helpful. 
So autodiscover will be able to transition automatically? 

currently the server it points to for us in outlook anywhere is our Clustered Mailbox server name. &quot;company-vex-001&quot; if you look at account properties. 

So what should appear after a mailbox move to 2010? the dag name the mailbox servers belong to?

Also, for this information to be updated automatically by autodiscover, is the legacy.domain.com  legacy hostnames required to be configured for this transition to work seamlessly, or no?

We&#039;re planning on a weekend transition and mailbox move that potentially wouldn&#039;t need co-existance and users wouldn&#039;t necessarily be actively accessing outlook during this time.

Any inpout would be great, as I can&#039;t find answers to these specific planning questions. 

Thanks,

Josh

Josh]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron, thanks for this post. Very helpful.<br />
So autodiscover will be able to transition automatically? </p>
<p>currently the server it points to for us in outlook anywhere is our Clustered Mailbox server name. &#8220;company-vex-001&#8243; if you look at account properties. </p>
<p>So what should appear after a mailbox move to 2010? the dag name the mailbox servers belong to?</p>
<p>Also, for this information to be updated automatically by autodiscover, is the legacy.domain.com  legacy hostnames required to be configured for this transition to work seamlessly, or no?</p>
<p>We&#8217;re planning on a weekend transition and mailbox move that potentially wouldn&#8217;t need co-existance and users wouldn&#8217;t necessarily be actively accessing outlook during this time.</p>
<p>Any inpout would be great, as I can&#8217;t find answers to these specific planning questions. </p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Josh</p>
<p>Josh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Outlook Anywhere Bug with Windows Server 2008 by srini</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=65#comment-86711</link>
		<dc:creator>srini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 04:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=65#comment-86711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[is it applicable for exchange 2010 with windows server 2008...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is it applicable for exchange 2010 with windows server 2008&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Outlook Anywhere Bug with Windows Server 2008 by surjeet taank</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=65#comment-44213</link>
		<dc:creator>surjeet taank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 02:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=65#comment-44213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great article and certainly saved me pulling my hair. Keep up the good work!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article and certainly saved me pulling my hair. Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Accessing Exchange from Mac OS X by Aaron Marks</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=42#comment-43578</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Marks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 16:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=42#comment-43578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The real problem with running Parallels constantly to run Office 2010 is that its going to have some really negative affects on battery life. 

As far as migrating to Google Apps: I&#039;d suggest really looking into what you&#039;re missing out on by moving to Gmail from Exchange. Make sure to run a pilot program and at the very least, compare it with a migration to Office 365. There have been many businesses before you that have moved to Google Apps and realized it was a mistake (only to then realize that it is either too late/expensive to switch to something else, should have gone to Microsoft&#039;s cloud platform for continuity of features, or should have upgraded internally for stability).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real problem with running Parallels constantly to run Office 2010 is that its going to have some really negative affects on battery life. </p>
<p>As far as migrating to Google Apps: I&#8217;d suggest really looking into what you&#8217;re missing out on by moving to Gmail from Exchange. Make sure to run a pilot program and at the very least, compare it with a migration to Office 365. There have been many businesses before you that have moved to Google Apps and realized it was a mistake (only to then realize that it is either too late/expensive to switch to something else, should have gone to Microsoft&#8217;s cloud platform for continuity of features, or should have upgraded internally for stability).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Accessing Exchange from Mac OS X by Allan Watton</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=42#comment-43564</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan Watton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 14:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=42#comment-43564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We did find a good workaround to this, but it depends on what your dependencies are as to whether it will work for you and whether the &#039;approach&#039; fits for you.

I moved to MAC just under two weeks ago after my Dell laptop died. We have SBS 2003 Exchange Server. Exchange works perfectly with the PC apps from Outlook 2003 through to 2010. I have been through a vertical learning curve understanding that with Office 2011 for MAC, it will not work with Exchange 2003. The 2011 Office for MAC is fantastic. However, I have had to abandon it because:

 1. We are migrating away from SBS Exchange 2003 to Gmail, so there is no point investing in an upgrade of Exchange 2007/2010 to make it MAC compatible.

 2. No matter what we tried, we couldn&#039;t get calendar access into Outlook, synchronisation of tasks etc. although we could get access to emails via IMAP using Apple Mail (and MAC Outlook 2011) using the Dav &#039;add-on&#039;.

What have I done to get around the problem? Heresy to MAC lovers I&#039;m afraid. The MAC 2011 (Trial) has been uninstalled of my beloved Macbook Air. I&#039;ve installed &#039;Parallels&#039; v.7 and the PC version of Office 2010, including Outlook 2010. Works like a dream and synchronises perfectly with SBS Exchange 2003. I and my team have access to each others calendars, tasks and so forth.

It&#039;s a compromise, but at least I can stay on the Mac until we move to Gmail/Google Apps/Calendar when I hope that I will be able to move to native Mac once again.

Best wishes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We did find a good workaround to this, but it depends on what your dependencies are as to whether it will work for you and whether the &#8216;approach&#8217; fits for you.</p>
<p>I moved to MAC just under two weeks ago after my Dell laptop died. We have SBS 2003 Exchange Server. Exchange works perfectly with the PC apps from Outlook 2003 through to 2010. I have been through a vertical learning curve understanding that with Office 2011 for MAC, it will not work with Exchange 2003. The 2011 Office for MAC is fantastic. However, I have had to abandon it because:</p>
<p> 1. We are migrating away from SBS Exchange 2003 to Gmail, so there is no point investing in an upgrade of Exchange 2007/2010 to make it MAC compatible.</p>
<p> 2. No matter what we tried, we couldn&#8217;t get calendar access into Outlook, synchronisation of tasks etc. although we could get access to emails via IMAP using Apple Mail (and MAC Outlook 2011) using the Dav &#8216;add-on&#8217;.</p>
<p>What have I done to get around the problem? Heresy to MAC lovers I&#8217;m afraid. The MAC 2011 (Trial) has been uninstalled of my beloved Macbook Air. I&#8217;ve installed &#8216;Parallels&#8217; v.7 and the PC version of Office 2010, including Outlook 2010. Works like a dream and synchronises perfectly with SBS Exchange 2003. I and my team have access to each others calendars, tasks and so forth.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a compromise, but at least I can stay on the Mac until we move to Gmail/Google Apps/Calendar when I hope that I will be able to move to native Mac once again.</p>
<p>Best wishes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Outlook Anywhere Bug with Windows Server 2008 by Jeff Allen</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=65#comment-35269</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 19:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=65#comment-35269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you so much, you are truly a God Send. This has been a nightmare.
Thank you]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much, you are truly a God Send. This has been a nightmare.<br />
Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MacBook trackpad problems in Boot Camp and OS X by Matt R</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=80#comment-34785</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 13:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=80#comment-34785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, it&#039;s almost Oct. 2011. My 2011 15&quot; MBP trackpad under Bootcamp sucks so bad that I&#039;ll be using a wireless mouse to get work done. So Apple really doesn&#039;t care that much. It&#039;s sad, because making this stuff work would actually help them displace Windows owners. Using the MBP as a native windows machine is not a good idea. Missing Windows Keys and the trackpad issues are so bad I wouldn&#039;t be able to reccomend this to anyone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s almost Oct. 2011. My 2011 15&#8243; MBP trackpad under Bootcamp sucks so bad that I&#8217;ll be using a wireless mouse to get work done. So Apple really doesn&#8217;t care that much. It&#8217;s sad, because making this stuff work would actually help them displace Windows owners. Using the MBP as a native windows machine is not a good idea. Missing Windows Keys and the trackpad issues are so bad I wouldn&#8217;t be able to reccomend this to anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MacBook trackpad problems in Boot Camp and OS X by Lisa Flinn</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=80#comment-34616</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Flinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 04:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=80#comment-34616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have this same problem and I got it fix by sending back to Apple. They change the whole top case. I think the factor causing this problem is the manufacture quality of top case. Sad to say that I have to buy a second wrist rest skin after they replaced mine. Don&#039;t you think that a MacBook Pro should match with a black wrist rest and trackpad? It look absolutely gorgeous.
http://www.skinstyler.com/black-wrist-rest-palmrest-protection-skin-p-453.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have this same problem and I got it fix by sending back to Apple. They change the whole top case. I think the factor causing this problem is the manufacture quality of top case. Sad to say that I have to buy a second wrist rest skin after they replaced mine. Don&#8217;t you think that a MacBook Pro should match with a black wrist rest and trackpad? It look absolutely gorgeous.<br />
<a href="http://www.skinstyler.com/black-wrist-rest-palmrest-protection-skin-p-453.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.skinstyler.com/black-wrist-rest-palmrest-protection-skin-p-453.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mac OS X Server 10.5 Open Directory Integration with Active Directory by Geoff</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=56#comment-34082</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 07:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=56#comment-34082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any new info you can add to this blog entry after several years?

I played around with Snow Leopard and had lots of issues with laptop non caching passwords that we are looking at the Open Directory route to see if that integrates better with our AD 2008 server system.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any new info you can add to this blog entry after several years?</p>
<p>I played around with Snow Leopard and had lots of issues with laptop non caching passwords that we are looking at the Open Directory route to see if that integrates better with our AD 2008 server system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Accessing Exchange from Mac OS X by Eduardo Mena</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=42#comment-32580</link>
		<dc:creator>Eduardo Mena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=42#comment-32580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any update on this post, since release of Office 2011 for MAC and the release of Office 365?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any update on this post, since release of Office 2011 for MAC and the release of Office 365?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mac OS X Server 10.5 Open Directory Integration with Active Directory by Steven White</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=56#comment-25939</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 23:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=56#comment-25939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a bump, I&#039;m in need of doing this in reverse. I need to bind Windows Server 2008 to an already existing OS/X Open Directory system to properly authenticate our wireless arrays via RADIUS in the AD.

Anyone still listening?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a bump, I&#8217;m in need of doing this in reverse. I need to bind Windows Server 2008 to an already existing OS/X Open Directory system to properly authenticate our wireless arrays via RADIUS in the AD.</p>
<p>Anyone still listening?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Accessing Exchange from Mac OS X by Charlie O'Hearn</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=42#comment-22937</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie O'Hearn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=42#comment-22937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi there,
My client is running SBS 2003 on backend with several Mac runing Macmail. Most connect to Exchange with IMAP, but the owner is running Entourage 2008 which connects fine to Exch on the LAN, but he must make a VPN connection when away from office.
I want to configure Outlook over RPC but must make sure it will work before I make any promises and start spending hours on the backend configuration.
Does anyone know if it will work?

Thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,<br />
My client is running SBS 2003 on backend with several Mac runing Macmail. Most connect to Exchange with IMAP, but the owner is running Entourage 2008 which connects fine to Exch on the LAN, but he must make a VPN connection when away from office.<br />
I want to configure Outlook over RPC but must make sure it will work before I make any promises and start spending hours on the backend configuration.<br />
Does anyone know if it will work?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Outlook Anywhere Bug with Windows Server 2008 by Matt H</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=65#comment-18876</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 09:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=65#comment-18876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, wrong switch n last line, should be:
ServerManagerCmd -i RPC-over-HTTP-proxy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, wrong switch n last line, should be:<br />
ServerManagerCmd -i RPC-over-HTTP-proxy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Outlook Anywhere Bug with Windows Server 2008 by Matt H</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=65#comment-18875</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 09:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=65#comment-18875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In response to Mike Hanley&#039;s question and for future ref, in SBS 2008 I needed to reinstall the rpc over http component, but the rpc dir needs to be under the &quot;SBS Web Applications&quot; website. It took me a long time to find this little known trick! I hope it prevents someone loosing as much sleep as I did...

1. if installed, use the powershell to remove the rpc over http component:
ServerManagerCmd -r RPC-over-HTTP-proxy
(nb. it is important to bo this before step 2 as this process also removes the rpcproxy key) 

2. create the following registry key, in this example for the SBS 2008 &quot;SBS Web Applications&quot; website
HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Rpc\RpcProxy\Website 
as a String, with value &quot;SBS Web Applications&quot;

3. reinstall the rpc proxy component:
ServerManagerCmd -r RPC-over-HTTP-proxy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to Mike Hanley&#8217;s question and for future ref, in SBS 2008 I needed to reinstall the rpc over http component, but the rpc dir needs to be under the &#8220;SBS Web Applications&#8221; website. It took me a long time to find this little known trick! I hope it prevents someone loosing as much sleep as I did&#8230;</p>
<p>1. if installed, use the powershell to remove the rpc over http component:<br />
ServerManagerCmd -r RPC-over-HTTP-proxy<br />
(nb. it is important to bo this before step 2 as this process also removes the rpcproxy key) </p>
<p>2. create the following registry key, in this example for the SBS 2008 &#8220;SBS Web Applications&#8221; website<br />
HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Rpc\RpcProxy\Website<br />
as a String, with value &#8220;SBS Web Applications&#8221;</p>
<p>3. reinstall the rpc proxy component:<br />
ServerManagerCmd -r RPC-over-HTTP-proxy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Accessing Exchange from Mac OS X by Anthony Maw</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=42#comment-18712</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Maw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 22:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=42#comment-18712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am now using Outlook 2011 for Mac and various flavours of Entourage for years now.  I think some of the confusion with Exchange compatiblity arises due to the number of different HTTP protocols that Exchange 2003/2007 has supported over the years:  Exchange 2003 did RPC over HTTPS and little-known WebDAV.  Exchange 2007 SP1 supports RPC over HTTP encapsulation, WebDAV and the  latest Exchange Web Services.  Entourage 2004/2008 used WebDAV.  Outlook 2011 dropped WebDAV for Exchange Web Services which is only available to Exchange 2007 SP1 and later.  WebDAV and EWS protocols have the upside that they allow Entourage/Outlook 2011 to connect to multiple Exchange Servers at the same time - something Outlook for PC usrs have been unable to do until Outlook 2010 which, guess what? also uses EWS protocol.  Anthony Maw, B.Sc.,MCSE, Vancouver, Canada, 604-318-9994, anthony@maw.bc.ca]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am now using Outlook 2011 for Mac and various flavours of Entourage for years now.  I think some of the confusion with Exchange compatiblity arises due to the number of different HTTP protocols that Exchange 2003/2007 has supported over the years:  Exchange 2003 did RPC over HTTPS and little-known WebDAV.  Exchange 2007 SP1 supports RPC over HTTP encapsulation, WebDAV and the  latest Exchange Web Services.  Entourage 2004/2008 used WebDAV.  Outlook 2011 dropped WebDAV for Exchange Web Services which is only available to Exchange 2007 SP1 and later.  WebDAV and EWS protocols have the upside that they allow Entourage/Outlook 2011 to connect to multiple Exchange Servers at the same time &#8211; something Outlook for PC usrs have been unable to do until Outlook 2010 which, guess what? also uses EWS protocol.  Anthony Maw, B.Sc.,MCSE, Vancouver, Canada, 604-318-9994, <a href="mailto:anthony@maw.bc.ca">anthony@maw.bc.ca</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Accessing Exchange from Mac OS X by Bob D.</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=42#comment-18268</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 05:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=42#comment-18268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, what is the answer when trying to connect Mac to Exchange 2003? It works seamlessly with the iphone and ipad, yet, i can now see it will not work with my new Mac..

please advise.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, what is the answer when trying to connect Mac to Exchange 2003? It works seamlessly with the iphone and ipad, yet, i can now see it will not work with my new Mac..</p>
<p>please advise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Outlook Anywhere Bug with Windows Server 2008 by Juniper Young</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=65#comment-17695</link>
		<dc:creator>Juniper Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 23:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=65#comment-17695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for posting this, I was just about ready to give up. My problem also lied in the Kernel Mode Authentication. These problems can be so frustrating sometimes!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting this, I was just about ready to give up. My problem also lied in the Kernel Mode Authentication. These problems can be so frustrating sometimes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Accessing Exchange from Mac OS X by Hey</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=42#comment-17529</link>
		<dc:creator>Hey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=42#comment-17529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey.
Is there a way to work on Mac (Snow Leopard 10.6.5) on the Windows Exchange 2000 Server? Probably not, if so, can I access an email by POP or any other way, excluding web interface?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey.<br />
Is there a way to work on Mac (Snow Leopard 10.6.5) on the Windows Exchange 2000 Server? Probably not, if so, can I access an email by POP or any other way, excluding web interface?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Outlook Anywhere Bug with Windows Server 2008 by Setting up Outlook Anywhere with Outlook 2007/Exchange 2007, NTLM authentication and ISA Server 2006 &#171; Morgan Simonsen&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=65#comment-16980</link>
		<dc:creator>Setting up Outlook Anywhere with Outlook 2007/Exchange 2007, NTLM authentication and ISA Server 2006 &#171; Morgan Simonsen&#039;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 03:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=65#comment-16980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=65 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=65" rel="nofollow">http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=65</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Accessing Exchange from Mac OS X by Kyle Davis</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=42#comment-16784</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=42#comment-16784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Snow Leopard Exchange Server 2007 support.

Can be summed up in 2 words.

yeah, right]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Snow Leopard Exchange Server 2007 support.</p>
<p>Can be summed up in 2 words.</p>
<p>yeah, right</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Outlook Anywhere Bug with Windows Server 2008 by Tina White</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=65#comment-16714</link>
		<dc:creator>Tina White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 20:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=65#comment-16714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have IPV6 disabled completely and for the most part Outlook Anywhere works.  We have users spread out from Puerto Rico to California.  Lately they have been reporting connections issues.  Their Outlook pops up a message saying &quot;trying to connect to server&quot;.  They can&#039;t do anything for at least a couple minutes.  The problem is intermittant and was originally assumed a routing dely across many hops.  So we didn&#039;t think much about it when the California users complained because the server is in Florida.  Lots of hops in between.  Then we had an incident where a local computer configured to use Outlook Anywhere HTTPS only, received the same message.  This computer was on the same subnet as the Exchange Server itself but not part of the domain.  Any idea where I should look?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have IPV6 disabled completely and for the most part Outlook Anywhere works.  We have users spread out from Puerto Rico to California.  Lately they have been reporting connections issues.  Their Outlook pops up a message saying &#8220;trying to connect to server&#8221;.  They can&#8217;t do anything for at least a couple minutes.  The problem is intermittant and was originally assumed a routing dely across many hops.  So we didn&#8217;t think much about it when the California users complained because the server is in Florida.  Lots of hops in between.  Then we had an incident where a local computer configured to use Outlook Anywhere HTTPS only, received the same message.  This computer was on the same subnet as the Exchange Server itself but not part of the domain.  Any idea where I should look?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Open Directory Issues by Matt</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=31#comment-16110</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 06:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=31#comment-16110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Aaron,

I am in the third category and I am having a problem with authenting to the workgroup manager. Nothings changes it just stopped working. Can you help please??

Matt]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Aaron,</p>
<p>I am in the third category and I am having a problem with authenting to the workgroup manager. Nothings changes it just stopped working. Can you help please??</p>
<p>Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Outlook Anywhere Bug with Windows Server 2008 by barney danzansky</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=65#comment-15750</link>
		<dc:creator>barney danzansky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 23:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronmarks.com/?p=65#comment-15750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for taking the time to share your experience.  It mirrored ours and your fix was elegant.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for taking the time to share your experience.  It mirrored ours and your fix was elegant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
